This is the "Getting
Started" page of the "Evaluating Information Sources" guide.
Alternate Page for Screenreader Users
Skip to Page Navigation
Skip to Page Content

Evaluating Information Sources   Tags: critical thinking, qep  

Provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of information sources, including books, journals, the open Internet, and primary sources.
Last Updated: Aug 15, 2014 URL: http://libguides.uhcl.edu/evaluating Print Guide RSS UpdatesEmail AlertsShareThis

Getting Started Print Page
  Search: 
 
 

Information and Critical Thinking

Implementation of UHCL's Quality Enhancement PlanApplied Critical Thinking for Lifelong Learning and Adaptability, follows the Foundation for Critical Thinking model, which includes information ("data, facts, reasons, observations, experiences, evidence"*) as one of the elements of reasoning or thought. Critical thinking must be informed by information that is:

  • clear
  • accurate
  • relevant
  • fair
  • sufficient

* Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools.Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2009. (p.3)

 

But how can I know...?

Question markWhen we lack the expertise or experience to judge accuracy and completeness, we look to indicators of quality and reliability: the authority of an author, book editor, or publisher, or a process such as peer review in which external subject experts determine acceptability for publication. Such indicators can't guarantee reliability absolutely, but they're key factors to look for as your own knowledge and critical thinking abilities grow.

The Foundation for Critical Thinking offers templates for thinking through the logic of an article, essay, or chapter, of a textbook, and for evaluating an author's reasoning. If needed, you also may be able to verify basic facts and find background information about a subject by checking recognized reference works and encyclopedias.

 

Definition of "Scholarly"

College-level assignments usually require the use of scholarly rather than popular information sources. The New Oxford American Dictionary (2nd ed.) defines scholarly as "involving or relating to serious academic study" and "having or showing knowledge, learning, or devotion to academic pursuits" (p. 1516).

 

Factors to Consider When Evaluating the Credibility of an Information Source

Authority

  • Are the author's credentials and/or expertise indicated?
  • Is the publisher or sponsoring body reputable?
  • Could either have a point of view or bias that should make you question that authority or content?

Currency

  • If timeliness is critical to the subject discipline or to the question at issue, how current is the information? Your professor may provide specific criteria on this aspect of an assignment (e.g., use sources no more than 10 years old).

Content

  • Is the main purpose of the communication to inform, entertain, convince, or sell, and how might that purpose influence the degree to which you should be skeptical?
  • Is the content relevant and suitable to the question you're considering?

Accuracy

  • Does the author's reasoning and presentation of evidence appear sound and complete?
  • Are facts correct? Should you consider checking another source for verification?
  • Are references or sources indicated?
 

Concerning Bias

Bias is a "prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair" or "a predisposition either for or against something" (The New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd ed., p. 159). In addition to looking for bias in an information source, consider your own predispositions for a particular point of view.

Bias can be reflected through:

Word Choice - Subtle differences in expressions, syntax and diction can signal bias. Look for differences when comparing two articles [or documents] on the same subject.

Omitted Information - Stories, facts and details need to be complete and verified to offer the most objective and informed picture. Omissions -- intentional and unintentional -- create slanted and/or incomplete pictures. Watch for differing information and the use of anonymous information for clues.

Framing - Framing is about context and how information is presented. Facts may be presented, but they may be put into a context/situation/pattern that emphasizes or de-emphasizes certain elements. Framing can be committed by manipulating the ideas or the actual physical location of an article.

Sources - Where is the article [or document] getting its information? Fair reporting will offer information that comes from a multitude of sources (most of them identifiable) and a variety of constituencies. Relying on just one source or unnamed sources can compromise reliability. Using sources with a vested interest in the topic or omitting source affiliations can slant.

Spin - Offering details or perspectives favorable to one side without adequate time/space/debate for alternate views.

(From Detecting Bias, Miller Library, Keystone College; used with permission)

Accessibility divider Best Viewed divider Clery Act divider Compact with Texans divider Emergency Information divider Maps & Directions divider Privacy
UH System divider Public Information divider Fraud Reporting divider MySafeCampus pargo1.uhcl.edu
281-283-3910   library@uhcl.edu    UHCL Neumann Library   UHCL Pearland Campus Library
Description

Loading  Loading...

Tip